Having watched the film "Babel" on DVD recently, I could not resist posting a link to a strange story I read on Yahoo! Movies: Movie News. The film opened in Japan this past weekend, and apparently there have been 15 reported cases of nausea and headaches from moviegoers. This is nothing new for a movie to cause such a reaction, as similar reports came out after the release of "Breaking the Waves" in 1996, the film starring Emily Watson which is set in a remote Scottish village and features scenes at sea on an oil rig shot with hand held cameras. Also, I myself felt a bit queasy after watching the shaky camerawork of "The Blair Witch Project" (1999), which was shot entirely in documentary style.
http://movies.yahoo.com/mv/news/ap/20070502/117813012000.html
That history aside, let me just say that after sitting through the rather lengthy and in my opinion much overrated exercise in angst called "Babel" I felt a little ill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc38e/dc38e8e6f744a9e8896cd1f6d77c9ee252f53de4" alt=""
1 Comments:
I watched Babel with my wife not too long ago and actually enjoyed it. The difficult part is that for a film to get noticed nowadays there needs to be massive amounts of money spent on visual effects, or else it needs a script that is basically saying "How can we interconnect stories like Pulp Fiction but on a much more massive level?" Sure, I know those aren't the only two ways for a film to make money (Angelina Jolie's bosoms will fill a theater), but it seems to be two of the easiest.
Despite that fact, I liked Babel. Not the kind of film I'd watch over and over again, but still an interesting tale.
shoes
Post a Comment
<< Home